• Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
Call us now: (602) 344 9865
Chelle Law
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Practice Areas
    • Professional Licensing Board Defense
    • Medical Contract Attorney
      • Physician Contract Attorney
      • Veterinarian Contract Attorney
      • Dentist Contract Attorney
      • Nurse Practitioner Contract Attorney
      • Physician Assistant Contract Attorney
    • Phoenix Criminal Lawyer
    • Scottsdale Criminal Lawyer
    • Fingerprint Card Attorney
      • Arizona Fingerprint Board Attorney
    • Arizona Student Defense
    • Arizona Teacher License Defense
    • Administrative Appeals and Hearings
      • Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings Attorney
      • Arizona DES Hearing Attorney
      • AHCCCS Fair Hearing Attorney
      • Arizona Registrar of Contractors Attorney
      • Arizona DHS Hearing Attorney
      • Arizona Department of Insurance Hearing Attorney
      • Arizona Child Safety Hearing Attorney
      • Arizona Adult Protective Services Hearing
  • Office Locations
    • Chelle Law – Arizona
  • Our Attorneys
    • Robert S. Chelle, Esq.
    • Sara Stark, Esq.
    • Renee Osipov, Esq.
    • Erin Howlett, Esq.
  • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
what is the difference between c

Difference Between Claims Made and Occurrence Malpractice

Blog, Physician Contract Review
Difference Between Claims Made and Occurrence Malpractice

What is the difference between claims-made and occurrence-based medical malpractice insurance? This is absolutely a topic that I generally talk to almost anyone about when I’m reviewing their contract. Those coming from training who’ve never really had to worry about this before. I find, they really don’t understand the differences between the two. And even those that have been out a while don’t know the difference. Let’s kind of break down each one and then compare the two. And maybe if you had the choice, which one would you want to go with? 

Claims-Made Policy

First, what is claims-made insurance? Claims-made medical malpractice insurance means a policy must be in effect when someone makes a claim. Why is this important? If a physician leaves an employer, there will be a gap between when they leave. And the last day someone can sue them. In most states, it’s two years. Most states also define that as two years from when the patient either knows or should have known of the incident that generates the malpractice claim. It’s theoretically possible to go beyond the two years, although it’s unlikely that that would happen. That means they need another policy because the claims-made policy ends when the physician leaves the employer. It is a gap policy or tail insurance. Covering that gap between when they leave, and the last day someone can sue them when the statute limitations run. 

Cost of Claims-Made 

In this case, let’s talk about the cost and then how often the physician must pay for it. If a physician works for a hospital, medical network, etc., they will never have to pay for tail. Because usually, in those situations, the employer is self-insured. If a physician works for a smaller physician-owned group, I’d say most of the time in those scenarios. The physician will be the one responsible for paying tail. 

Now, the cost. A good rule of thumb is that tail insurance costs about twice your annual premium. The annual premium is how much the employer pays for your insurance each year. Let’s say you are primary care. Most states’ primary care will cost around $6,000 a year. So, if the physician was responsible for the tail, multiply that by two. Their tail insurance cost would be about $12,000. It’s a one-time payment, usually paid before the physician leaves or simultaneous to the termination date. 

They paid $12,000, which covers the gap. Some tail insurance policies are generally a specific amount of time. Some of them will state, they will cover until the statute limitation in that state ends. That’s generally what the cost, tail insurance, and then what claims-made insurance is. Now, let’s talk about the other type of insurance. 

Occurrence-Based Policy

Occurrence-based insurance means a policy must be in effect when the incident occurs. Not when someone makes a claim, but when it happens. If someone is employed, the event will occur while they are employed. And so, a tail policy is not needed for an occurrence-based insurance policy.

 Why would anyone get a claims-made policy instead of an occurrence-based policy? That way, they can avoid having to get two separate policies. Well, it’s costly. Once again, a good rule of thumb is that occurrence-based insurance is generally about 33%. A third more expensive than a claims-made policy. Suppose someone once again is primary care, and they have a $6,000 annual premium. If they had an occurrence-based, then it would be $8,000. Indeed, if the employer gives them a choice, the physician would want occurrence-based insurance. Why? Because they won’t have to pay for the tail when the contract terminates. 

Difference Between Claims Made and Occurrence Malpractice

Difference Between the Two in Practice

However, most private small physician-owned groups do not pay occurrence-based coverage. They pay claims-made coverage just because it’s cheaper. And they want to give the responsibility for tail coverage to the physician. It just saves them money. An occurrence-based policy would make more sense for a physician, but the cost is also an issue. Usually, if there is a choice and you need to calculate, how long will I be staying with this employer? And then whether I pay a third more, if you’re the one that must pay, which usually you don’t. Me paying a third more each year would offset having to pay twice the annual premium down the road when you must pay for the tail coverage.

If the physician has the choice, certainly go with the occurrence-based coverage. If they’re not paying for it, but the employer will, then go for occurrence. Or if not, then the negotiation part of this goes into alright. Well, if I have a claims-made policy, who will pay for the tail after the agreement ends? Depending upon specialty, this can be a critical part of the negotiation. 

Sharing the Cost For Tail

For instance, if someone is an OB-GYN, their tail coverage and annual premium costs are high. I’ve seen some tail costs for an OB-GYN are 50,000, 80,000. It’s not an insignificant amount of money, and bargaining over who’s responsible can be a huge part of the negotiation. Some employers will get creative. They might say, alright, if you stay for one year, we’ll pay for a quarter of the tail policy. For two years, we’ll pay for half. And then, if you get to four years, we’ll pay for it. 

Tiering it up incentivizes the physician to stay because they don’t have to pay for it at the end. And it’s just fair that both parties would share the cost. Some places will do 50-50. So, if you leave, we’ll pay half your tail, you pay half your tail, and then you can move on. So, those are the differences between occurrence and claims-made medical malpractice insurance for physicians. Hopefully, that’s helpful.

What is Tail Coverage?

Tail Insurance, also known as Extended Reporting Period coverage, must be purchased when a physician has claims-made liability insurance coverage. Tail insurance covers the gap between when a physician leaves an employer and when the statute of limitations on filing a medical malpractice claim ends. 

Malpractice coverage is a type of professional liability coverage. It helps protect physicians and other healthcare professionals from the financial risks associated with lawsuits. Lawsuits in which patients believe they were harmed as a result of an incident involving medical care. The coverage depends on how much the policy is worth (premium) and your specialty.  Personal injury attorneys are more likely to take cases against physicians working in hospitals than those who practice family medicine or internal medicine in private practice.

Most malpractice insurance carriers provide coverage with a deductible clause that can range between $0 -$100k per incident. With most doctors opting for higher deductibles due to lower premiums. A deductible clause in a malpractice policy stipulates that the insurance company won’t provide coverage for any expenses incurred by the insured. For injuries or damages up to an agreed-upon amount. A deductible clause in a malpractice policy stipulates that the insurance company will not cover any expenses incurred by the insured for injuries or damages up to an agreed-upon amount per incident. The typical company’s deductible is usually $5000. But it can be higher, sometimes as high as $50,000, depending on individual state requirements and claims history.

Other Blogs of Interest

  • What Should a Physician Offer Letter Include?
  • Who Owns the Medical Record as an Employed Physician?

What Are Types of Medical Malpractice Insurance?

What are the different types of medical malpractice insurance? This discussion is a frequent topic when I’m reviewing a contract. Most physicians are not given a breakdown of the different types of malpractice insurance during med school or training. So, talking to a relatively new physician who doesn’t understand the difference is always a good idea. Let’s give a brief breakdown of each medical malpractice insurance and maybe the pros and cons. There are three main types of professional liability insurance for physicians. You have self-insurance programs from extensive hospital networks. Then most private practices will utilize one of two, either occurrence-based coverage or claims-made insurance.

Self Insurance

Let’s just kind of talk about three of them—first, self-insurance. Large hospital networks usually have their policy: they’ll set aside a pot of money and pay claim out of that. In that circumstance, generally, the physician doesn’t have to worry about purchasing a tail. The employer’s self-insurance program covers that. This is great. I mean, it’s excellent insurance when a physician never has to worry about the tail coverage. And doesn’t have to worry about paying for the underlying premium. That is a lovely, secure feeling, and that’s what most large hospital networks utilize.

Difference Between Claims Made and Occurrence Malpractice

Occurrence-Based Policy

Occurrence-based coverage is one of the types of malpractice insurance. And that means a policy has to be in effect when the event occurs. Any malpractice event will occur while you’re employed with the employer. So, you are covered in perpetuity if an occurrence-based policy is in place and then something happens. The benefit of occurrence-based insurance is that you don’t need to purchase a tail coveragel. The downside is it costs more than a claims-made policy. 

A good rule of thumb is that occurrence is about a third more expensive than claims-made policies annual your premium. So to give an example, let’s say you have a claims-made policy, and it’s 6,000, then your occurrence-based coverage would be around 8,000 per year. There is a math equation that needs to be considered to determine what is the best policy for a physician. And I’ll get into that in the end. But honestly, physicians often don’t have a choice between an occurrence-based or a claims-made policy. It’s whatever the employer chooses to provide.

Claims-Made Malpractice Insurance 

That is what the physician must pursue. The last one is claims-made. That means a policy must be in effect when the claim is made. When someone terminates a contract and no longer works for the employer, there is a gap between their last day of practice with that employer and the last day somebody can sue. That’s called the statute of limitations for malpractice claim. In most states, it’s two years. If there is no policy in effect if a claim is made, then the physician is in trouble. Nearly every employer will require one of the parties to purchase tail coverage. 

Tail insurance covers that gap between the last day a physician works for the employer and the last day somebody can sue them. Now, it’s two years from when the patient either knows or should have known of a malpractice incident. It could go past two years if there were no way for the patient to understand until a few years later. I’d say most of the time if a physician works for private practice, a small physician-owned group, or something like that. They will have to be the one that purchases the tail coverage policy. Some employers will pay for it, but I’d say the physician is responsible for their tail coverage more often than not. 

Employment Contract Questions?

Contract Review, Termination Issues and more!

Click Here for More Information
March 3, 2022/by admin
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://www.chellelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/what-is-the-difference-between-c.jpg 720 1280 admin https://www.chellelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/cropped-favicon-1-300x300.png admin2022-03-03 17:49:302022-09-26 00:43:31Difference Between Claims Made and Occurrence Malpractice

Call Us Now: 602.344.9865

Contact Us

If you are in need of assistance or would like to hear more about the services we offer contact Chelle Law today!

Links of Interest

  • Home
  • Dentist Contract Attorney
  • Nurse Practitioner Contract Attorney
  • Optometrist Contract Attorney
  • Physician Contract Attorney
  • Physician Assistant Contract Attorney
  • Veterinarian Contract Attorney
Google
Based on 163 reviews
Robert Benincasa
Robert Benincasa
2022-11-18
I found the entire staff to be very personable and professional. From our initial conversation to the final, favorable outcome, I was very impressed. The staff helped me with every step of the process which I really appreciated. I absolutely felt at ease and confident with leaving my situation in the capable hands of Chelle law and I’m confident you will too. Bob
Nicole Insko
Nicole Insko
2022-11-17
Great experience, they had insightful questions that I asked my soon to be employer and really helped me understand the contract.
Kayla Arthur
Kayla Arthur
2022-11-11
Very quick to set up, evaluate, and return my contract. Less than 3 days. Smooth, hassle free process. 100% would use again.
Karine DeSouza
Karine DeSouza
2022-11-11
knowledgable, readily available, and able to walk you through getting your contract negotiated with quick turnaround. would recommend to anyone and would use their service again.
Prashant Sharma
Prashant Sharma
2022-11-08
I had a wonderful experience with Chelle Law. I asked to have my Job Contract reviewed. The attorney called me to do a point by point analysis of the contract along with suggestions on what to change. I felt much more secure having reviewed my contract with this firm. I also made the suggestions to my workplace and they made the changes.
Catarina Ramirez
Catarina Ramirez
2022-11-08
Very fast response. We’re talking about 10 minutes I got an email. Communication throughout the process was efficient and prompt. Erin was great, listened to all my questions without making me feel dumb.
Kesha Thomas Williams
Kesha Thomas Williams
2022-11-06
I received timely, thorough review of my contract with such attention to detail that I was able to make a decision with confidence!
Sarah Shami
Sarah Shami
2022-11-06
Amazing! I needed my PA employment contract reviewed since it was pretty technical and legal. I submitted a request one night and received an email the next morning. I was given 3 different packages, and I chose the middle one so I can have the opportunity to have some more options added on during my review. I was assigned to attorney Renee. She was very knowledgeable, kind, and also very helpful in terms of what she thought I should ask for in changes to my contract. I was so happy I went with this firm since they specialize as well. And the cost was completely worth it!! Thank you so much! I already recommended someone else to come here! 5 stars is not enough.
Leah P.
Leah P.
2022-10-31
Erin helped me review contracts for General Dentist position. She was very detail orientated and patience during the process. I will highly recommend her for dentist contract reviews.
Justin G
Justin G
2022-10-23
Really great experience this group. Had a very thorough review of a contract with excellent advice and follow-up after revisions. The process was very simple, very efficient, and very professional. Excellent communication and everyone was very kind as well. After some really terrible experiences with contract review, this was definitely the best and would highly recommend them. If I ever need a support in the future I will certainly reach out to them again.

Call Us Today!

602.344.9865

Hours/Office

Monday-Friday: 8:00am-5:00pm (MST/MDT)

Chelle Law 5425 E. Bell Rd, Ste 107

Scottsdale, AZ 85254

Contact Us Today!

5425 E. Bell Rd, Ste 107, Scottsdale, AZ 85254

info@chellelaw.com

Practice Areas

  • Professional Licensing Board Defense
  • Medical Contract Lawyer
  • Administrative Appeals & Hearings
  • Medical Contract Drafting
  • Fingerprint Card Attorney

Office Locations

  • Arizona
  • Indiana

Company

  • Robert S. Chelle, Esq. Founder & CEO
  • Sara Stark, Esq. Attorney
  • Renee Osipov, Esq. Attorney
  • Erin Howlett, Esq. Attorney

Resources

  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

Follow Us

© 2022 Chelle Law. All rights reserved.  Disclaimer & Terms of Use.  Privacy Policy.

What is a Physician Non-Solicitation Agreement? | Medical Contractswhat is a physician non solicitawho owns the medical record as aWho Owns a Patient’s Medical Record in a Private Practice?
Scroll to top

How Much PTO Should a Physician Get Download



How Much PTO Should a Physician Get?

4 Factors to Consider with PTO

How Much Does Tail Insurance Cost Download

How Much Does Tail Insurance Cost for a Physician?

4 Key Aspects of Tail Insurance for Physicians

Physician Contract Review Checklist

Where Should We Send the Physician Contract Checklist?

28 Essential Physician Contract Terms to Put You in a Positive Financial Situation for Years to Come.