Arizona Bar Criminal Self Report | AZ Bar Complaint Attorney

Rule 54. Grounds for Discipline of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, Arizona Revised Statutes holds that an attorney licensed in Arizona may be disciplined by the State Bar of Arizona upon the conviction of certain crimes. Rule 54 holds that an attorney shall be disciplined for:

• Conviction of a misdemeanor involving a serious crime
• Conviction of ANY felony

A serious crime is defined as any crime that involves interference with the administration of justice, false swearing, misrepresentation, fraud, willful extortion, misappropriation, theft or moral turpitude. A conspiracy, a solicitation of another or any attempt to commit a serious crime, is considered a serious crime.

The lawyer’s criminal serious crime or felony conviction is treated and processed like any other charge against a lawyer, except that the sole issue to be determined shall be the extent of the discipline to be imposed not whether the attorney should be disciplined at all.

Attorney Duty to Self-Report

Arizona Supreme Court Rule 61 describes the attorney’s duty to self-report certain criminal convictions to the State Bar of Arizona.

A lawyer shall, within twenty (20) days after the entry of judgment of a conviction of a misdemeanor involving a serious crime (as defined above) or of any felony, release records and report the following information to chief bar counsel:

• Name
• bar number
• address of record with the state bar,
• current address if different from the address of record;
• the name of the court in which the judgment of conviction was entered;
• the case or file number in which the judgment of conviction was entered; and
• the date the judgment of conviction was entered.

Criminal Conviction of a Felony

A lawyer shall be suspended after the clerk’s receipt of proof of the lawyer’s conviction of a felony under either state or federal law, regardless of post conviction motions or an appeal, unless within ten (10) days of the clerk’s receipt of proof of the conviction the member files with the presiding disciplinary judge a verified motion showing good cause why the suspension should not be entered.

The presiding disciplinary judge may permit the lawyer to present oral argument in support of the lawyer’s motion and shall promptly grant or deny it. If the motion is denied, the lawyer shall be suspended as of the date the motion is denied. If the motion is granted, the lawyer shall not be suspended pending completion of a proceeding based on such conviction.

Serious Crime Misdemeanor Conviction for Attorneys

A lawyer convicted of a serious crime other than a felony may be suspended, upon motion of bar counsel, pending final disposition of a proceeding predicated upon the conviction. Within ten (10) days of bar counsel filing a motion, respondent may file with the presiding disciplinary judge a verified response showing good cause why respondent should not be suspended. The presiding judge may permit respondent to present oral argument in support of the respondent’s response and shall promptly grant or deny the motion. If the motion is granted, the lawyer shall be suspended as of the date of such order.

Reinstatement after a Conviction is Reversed or Vacated

If a lawyer is suspended due to the instances listed above, the lawyer can have their interim suspension vacated if they demonstrate that the underlying conviction has been reversed or vacated. If the lawyer provides proof that the conviction has been reversed or vacated, the order for interim suspension shall be vacated and the lawyer placed on active status.

However, if the interim suspension is vacated is does not mean that any investigation by the Bar automatically terminates. Any pending proceeding against the lawyer will be determined on the basis of the available evidence.

Arizona Lawyer Bar Ethics Rules

The AZ Rules of Professional Responsibility (“ARPR”) are a set of guidelines that govern a lawyer’s ethical obligations. These rules cover a wide range of topics and provide a framework for how a lawyer should react in certain situations. The ARPR also outline sanctions for violating these rules, which can include suspension from the practice of law. Commons areas where attorneys can get into trouble include:

• Conflicts of interest
• Failure to disclose adverse interests
• Theft of client settlements
• Fraud, deceit and misrepresentation
• Failure to protect confidential information
• Failure to report attorney misconduct
• Criminal Convictions

Sometimes it can be tough to know where the line is between creative and unethical conduct – especially if you’re recently licensed to practice or starting out on your own. Our Arizona Bar Ethics Lawyer is available to address specific ethical concerns; so that you don’t find yourself in a tight spot!

Types of State Discipline

The 2020 Annual Report of the Attorney Regulation Advisory Committee to the Arizona Supreme Court listed there were the following actions against attorneys licensed in Arizona in 2020:

• Disbarred 8
• Suspended 36
• Reprimanded 24
• Diversion Agreements 122
• Dismissals with Comment 191

As a lawyer, receiving a charge or inquiry letter from the State Bar of Arizona can be a scary thing. After receipt of the inquiry letter, the lawyer must respond to the Bar within the time frame listed within the letter. In 2020 the Bar received 2285 charges with 403 of those referred to investigation. Our Arizona Lawyer Discipline Counsel can assist with all Arizona Bar issues.

Attorney Discipline after Intake Review

However, most of the time an inquiry initiated after the Bar receives a “complaint” against a lawyer will begin with a call from an Intake Attorney with the Bar’s Lawyer Regulation Department. This Department resolves disputes and investigates allegations of misconduct, incapacity or lack of professionalism. After the intake call the Bar can:

• Dismiss the charge
• Offer Diversion
• Prepare a Written Charge and refer the matter to the Litigation Department

Legal Ethics Practice

If you’re interested in learning more about our Arizona Bar Complaint Attorney services and how to protect your license, set up a consultation with Chelle Law and reach out to us today.

Arizona Unauthorized Practice of Law Counsel

The Arizona Supreme Court has jurisdiction over any person or entity engaged in the authorized or unauthorized practice of law (upl) in Arizona via Rule 31 of the Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court. The practice of law is defined as the following:

• Preparing or expressing legal opinions to or for another person or entity;
• Representing a person or entity in a judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative proceeding, or other formal dispute resolution process such as arbitration or mediation;
• Preparing a document, in any medium, on behalf of a specific person or entity for filing in any court, administrative agency, or tribunal;
• Negotiating legal rights or responsibilities on behalf of a specific person or entity; or
• Preparing a document, in any medium, intended to affect or secure a specific person’s or entity’s legal rights.

Unauthorized Practice of Law Jurisdiction

The State Bar of Arizona can take action against an Arizona attorney that has been disbarred or suspended lawyers that continue to practice law or lawyers admitted in other states that are practicing law in AZ. The Bar can also take action against non-lawyers who are practicing law through expenses, costs and cease and desist orders. Thus those subject to the unauthorized practice of law are:

• Disbarred or suspended lawyers
• Out of State lawyers
• Non-lawyers

The Arizona Bar primarily handles the cases involving Arizona lawyers and lawyers from out of state. Non-lawyer cases are usually handled by the Arizona Superior Courts.

Attorney Discipline after Intake Review

However, most of the time an inquiry is initiated after the Bar receives a “complaint” against a lawyer will begin with a call from an Intake Attorney with the Bar’s Lawyer Regulation Department. This Department resolves disputes and investigates allegations of misconduct, incapacity or lack of professionalism. After the intake call the Bar can:

• Dismiss the charge
• Offer Diversion
• Prepare a Written Charge and refer the matter to the Litigation Department

Litigation Department Screening Investigation

The vast majority of charges are concluded in the Intake Department; however, if the charge is not dismissed or resolved via diversion, it will move forward for a screening investigation with the Arizona Bar’s Litigation Department. The Department’s assigned attorney reviews the charge, the lawyer’s response and the gathered evidence. The Bar’s attorney can continue to investigate and obtain additional evidence if desired. The assigned Litigation attorney then creates a Report of Investigation and makes recommendation to conclude the matter. The Litigation Department investigation can conclude via:

• Dismissal
• Diversion
• Discipline

If the Litigation Department recommends diversion or discipline the case is submitted to the Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee (“ADPCC”). The ADPCC reviews the Litigation Department’s recommendations and can:

• Affirm the Department’s recommendation
• Change the recommendation
• Dismiss the case
• Direct further investigation

If the lawyer under investigation disagrees with the ADPCC decision they have the opportunity to object and demand formal proceedings with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Arizona Supreme Court.

Consultation With Chelle Law

If you’re interested in learning more about our Arizona Bar Complaint Attorney services and how we can help to protect your license, set up a consultation with Chelle Law and reach out to us today.